The 2009 Standish report on the success of IT projects is out. Perhaps surprisingly, it shows that there has an increase in failure of IT projects, from previous years
http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php
“This year’s results show a marked decrease in project success rates, with 32% of all projects succeeding which are delivered on time, on budget, with required features and functions” says Jim Johnson, chairman of The Standish Group, “44% were challenged which are late, over budget, and/or with less than the required features and functions and 24% failed which are cancelled prior to completion or delivered and never used.”
In my opinion, the increase in failures is due to a few more or less obvious factors:
- technology has been increased in complexity
- adoption of Agile practices has been surprisingly slow
- there is a difficult economic environment, with scarcer resources (such as investment money) leading to more stressful and error-prone environments
To these, I’d like to add Jeff Sutherland’s remarks that with most current practices, project success doesn’t pay because …
“* Industry incentives now are for projects to be late.
*Many vendors only make money if the project is late
and over budget due to change requests and building
functionality the end users do not want.
*CIOs participate in this dysfunctional behavior using
their current proposal and contracting process.
*The whole industry could be viewed as driven by bad
incentives and faulty practices”
(http://jeffsutherland.com/scrum/2008/08/agile-2008-money-for-nothing.html)
0 responses so far ↓
There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.
Leave a Comment